|
(詳細はlegal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors varies from country to country and concerns simulated pornography and child pornography. Some analysts have argued whether such cartoon depiction is a "victimless crime".〔(Unsavoury cartoon ruling sparks debate in Sweden ) icenews〕〔(Being virtual: who you really are online ) Davey Winder Page 155〕 Laws have been enacted to criminalize "obscene images of children, no matter how they are made", for inciting abuse. An argument is the claim that obscene fictional images portray children as sex objects, thereby contributing to child sexual abuse. This argument has been disputed by the fact that there is no scientific basis for that connection as of 1999,〔In (Free Speech Coalition v. Reno ) (later Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition), the court held that "()actual studies that establish the link between computer-generated child pornography and the subsequent sexual abuse of children apparently do not yet exist."〕 and that restricting sexual expression in drawings or animated games and videos might actually increase the rate of sexual crime by eliminating an outlet for desires that could motivate crime.〔(Can cartoon child pornography help paedophiles? ) radio Netherlands〕 Currently, countries that have made it illegal to possess (as well as create and distribute) sexual images of fictional characters who are described as or appear to be under eighteen years old include Canada, South Africa, South Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=House wants to ban pornographic cartoon )〕〔Email from the IWF.org.uk〕 At the upper edge, this encapsulates pornographic depictions of even seventeen-year-olds together, or adults where the predominant impression conveyed is of a person under the age of 18 (such as small-breasted women). ==Australia== (詳細はAustralia, and there is a "zero-tolerance" policy in place.〔McLelland, Mark. (The World of Yaoi: The Internet, Censorship and the Global "Boys’ Love" Fandom ) ''Australian Feminist Law Journal'', 2005.〕 In December 2008, a man from Sydney was convicted of possessing child pornography after sexually explicit pictures of children characters from ''The Simpsons'' were found on his computer. The NSW Supreme Court upheld a Local Court decision that the animated Simpsons characters "depicted", and thus "could be considered", real people. Controversy arose over the perceived ban on small-breasted women in pornography after a South Australian court established that if a consenting adult in pornography were "reasonably" deemed to look under the age of consent, then they could be considered depictions of child pornography. Criteria described stated "small breasts" as one of few examples, leading to the outrage. Again, the classification law is not federal or nationwide and only applies to South Australia.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Aussie censor balks at bijou boobs )〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|